Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

proofs without words

  • Aug. 23rd, 2004 at 2:36 PM
side-beard-flip


(I should note that this graphic is not by me, its from: QED: Beauty in Mathematical Proof)

Comments

[info]kirinn wrote:
Aug. 23rd, 2004 03:08 pm (UTC)
That's the coolest obvious thing I've seen all week. It may help me remember the exact formula for sums on the fly when I haven't thought about them recently. Nifty.
(no subject) - [info]pmb - Aug. 23rd, 2004 03:16 pm (UTC)
[info]pmb wrote:
Aug. 23rd, 2004 03:19 pm (UTC)
Freaking enter key doing the wrong things. Second try.
 2 * ( # + ## + ### + #### ) = ####
                               O###
                               OO##                                    
                               OOO#
                               OOOO
Your thoughts are therefore approximately 90 degrees to mine :)
[info]is2disney wrote:
Aug. 23rd, 2004 04:33 pm (UTC)
Love it! We do a unit on sums of consecutive numbers in my summer pre-algebra program. This would be one more great way to show them "why" the formula works once they're derived it.
[info]istgut wrote:
Aug. 23rd, 2004 04:47 pm (UTC)
It might be easier to understand *faster* if you annotated it a bit...

For example, have little size markers on the top and on the right that show how long the things are, and also have a REALLY thick line dividing the two sides, or perhaps a break between them... or perhaps an intermediate step
showing that the line of objects can be built up into the stack of objects.
[info]peneli wrote:
Aug. 23rd, 2004 06:16 pm (UTC)
I spent five minutes going "But that doesn't work!" and seriously confusing my roommates and then realized I'd completely missed the "2*" on the left. heh. Penny = oblivious.

Pretty cool though.
[info]zudini wrote:
Aug. 23rd, 2004 09:26 pm (UTC)
beatiful proofs
If you haven't read it, I recommend Journey through Genius. At least, I really loved it when I was in high school. I'm not sure how good it would be to read as a B.S..
[info]pmb wrote:
Aug. 23rd, 2004 09:42 pm (UTC)
Re: beatiful proofs
[info]gustavolacerda wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2004 05:50 am (UTC)
I came up with a geometrical derivation of this result when I was 14 (area of big triangle + n small triangles = n^2/2 + n*(1/2)). My math teacher later told me he too had come up with it when we was a teenager (counting dots, rather than squares).
[info]175560 wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2004 10:58 pm (UTC)
Some friends of mine in grad school figured out how to do a similar 3-dimensional proof of 1 + 4 + 9 + ... + n^2 = n * (n+1) * (2*n+1) / 6. It turns out that six pyramid thingies can make a rectangular prism.

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow