Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Libertarian / Green Party alliance?

  • Aug. 3rd, 2004 at 1:38 AM
side-beard-flip
Read about the possibilities on the Reason blog. This is probably irrelevant to national-level politics since two times zero (senators/congressman/electoral votes/governers/whatever) is still zero...but there may be a few issues / elections / jurisdictions where the combination is effective. And the LP needs any straws of effectiveness it can grasp.

Comments

[info]resipisco wrote:
Aug. 3rd, 2004 06:43 am (UTC)
Speaking of unlikely alliances, Michael Moore and Bill Maher recently surrounded Ralph Nader, got down on their knees, and begged him not to run.
[info]robbbbbb wrote:
Aug. 3rd, 2004 08:37 am (UTC)
Unlikely alliance? How about unholy.
The Libertarian Party will be making a significant mistake by cozying up to the Greens. The Greens are the kind face of statism. They offer to solve the worlds problems by concentrating power in their hands. "The world is broken and we can fix it," promise the Greens. That's antithetical to the LP message, and they'll sell out everything they claim to believe in if they do it.

The Libertarian Party is a contradiction in terms. It's an organization devoted to reducing the power of the government by putting themselves into power. Consequently, I don't think they'll ever accumulate significant political power, because its adherents don't have that drive or will to power- if they did, they'd be in the GOP or Democrat parties.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Aug. 3rd, 2004 01:22 pm (UTC)
Re: Unlikely alliance? How about unholy.
If the LP and the Greens agree on some specific issues (and they do), why not work together on those issues? I don't see why the other differences are relevant. We're not talking about a general alliance.

I agree with you about the LP.

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow