The NYT (which I read every morning, BTW) has an excellent article on the current state of the economy, how bad things are, and how bad they are likely to get:
Uncomfortable Answers to Questions on the Economy
Most popular writing on economic topics is trash, whereas this article rattles off all the things that "those in the know" (at least, subjectively, by my judgement of who to read and believe) talk about: historical price:rent ratios, Case-Shiller index (rather than the less accurate OFHEO price index), the effect of Mortgage Equity Withdrawal, the overhang in home inventory, etc.
The graphic is also worth looking at
Uncomfortable Answers to Questions on the Economy
Most popular writing on economic topics is trash, whereas this article rattles off all the things that "those in the know" (at least, subjectively, by my judgement of who to read and believe) talk about: historical price:rent ratios, Case-Shiller index (rather than the less accurate OFHEO price index), the effect of Mortgage Equity Withdrawal, the overhang in home inventory, etc.
The economy is in the midst of a very rough patch. The worst is probably still ahead.
Job losses will probably accelerate through this year and into 2009, and the job market will probably stay weak even longer. Home prices will probably keep falling, shrinking household wealth and eroding spending power.
“The open question is whether we’re in for a bad couple of years, or a bad decade,” said Kenneth S. Rogoff, a former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, now a professor at Harvard.
...
The economy is not in recession until a panel at a private institution called the National Bureau of Economic Research says so. Unofficially, many economists think a recession started six or seven months ago, even as the economy has continued to expand — albeit at a tepid pace.
...
Whatever it is called, it is a painful time for tens of millions of people. Indeed, this may turn out to be the most wrenching downturn since the two recessions in the early 1980s; almost surely worse than the recession that ended the technology bubble at the beginning of this decade; perhaps worse than the downturn of the early 1990s that followed the last dip in real estate prices.
But, despite what some doomsayers now proclaim, this is not the Great Depression, when unemployment spiked to 25 percent and millions of previously working people woke up in shantytowns. Not by any measure, even as your neighbors make cryptic remarks above dusting off lessons passed down from grandparents about how to turn a can of beans into a family meal.
...
More than two years ago, Nouriel Roubini, an economist at the Stern School of Business at New York University, said that the housing bubble would give way to a financial crisis and a recession. He was widely dismissed as an attention-seeking Chicken Little. Now, Mr. Roubini says the worst is yet to come, because the account-squaring has so far been confined mostly to bad mortgages, leaving other areas remaining — credit cards, auto loans, corporate and municipal debt.
Mr. Roubini says the cost of the financial system’s losses could reach $2 trillion. Even if it’s closer to $1 trillion, he adds, “we’re not even a third of the way there.”
Where will the banks raise the huge sums needed to replenish the capital they have apparently lost? And what will happen if they cannot?
The answers to these questions are unknown, an unsettling void that holds much of the economy at a standstill.
The graphic is also worth looking at


Comments
Every year the "power" that an individual has to affect the world increases. A carpenter with a circular saw is more effective than 5 with hack saws, and so on. Just by knowing a little bit and having access to the internet and sourceforge, you personally could put together software packages in days that would have taken months or years for a team to produce in the 90s.
So, back when Henry Ford started mass producing cars, and trivialized the human component into something that a trained ant could do, he needed a bunch of people to build them. Now we build cars with far less people, as most of the tasks are automated.
I don't know - I'm just rambling, I guess. I suppose that I see the value of humans over machines in their current advantage when it comes to ingenuity. It doesn't seem like there is enough "stuff of value" for people to do for anyone that would take 8 hours a day, 5 days a week to provide anymore. Maybe some, but not for most. For most, they might end up providing one thing of value ever, if they're lucky enough to have an original idea.
I guess my question is what will come after this next downturn. A re-thinking of the entire system? It feels like anything short of that would be just delaying the inevitable. We ned to figure out how the world is going to turn when 99% of people don't have anything of value to offer. A really high percentage right now are little more than humanoid robots.
I suppose I should just codify my ideas a little better and write some science fiction books that the knowledgeable of the future can laugh at.
I guess seasteads will be a good place to test out new economies as well as governments, no? I'll do my best to link every comment I ever have back to Seasteading.