Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

side-beard-flip
Story here. I have to agree with the author that the real insanity here is not that they checked him out for writing the word "bomb" in a sentence on his newspaper in an airplane. The insanity is that after finding out that he was just brainstorming dialogue for his amateur novel, they still put him on the Watch List. That's fucked-up. I mean, I can see being in the same situation from reading (or writing) a book or article with the word "Anarchy" in the title or text, which could happen easily enough.

Comments

[info]magicpacket wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 07:20 pm (UTC)
At least he didn't try to take pictures of public landmarks (while black).
[info]magicpacket wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 07:28 pm (UTC)
Then again, it makes some sense. There's been a complaint about the guy, and it turned out to seem innocent, but they record it just in case there turns out to be a pattern. Think about, say, Mudd's honor code. If a prof catches a student cheating, they're required to report it to the honor board even if they come to a mutually agreeable settlement without the board's help. That way a student can't get away with cheating a little bit here and there but always slightly below the radar of a central authority. I'm not sure what sort of special treatment he's in for on the DHS watch list - probably more than is deserved - but the fact that the incident was recorded makes sense.
[info]foolmonkey wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 07:30 pm (UTC)
Yes, well "makes sense" and "should be done" are two rather different categories. I can think of a great many things that make sense that I strongly disagree with, and probably a few things that I believe should be done even if they don't make sense, though this is a more debatable point...
[info]zuleikhajami wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 10:05 pm (UTC)
Hmm... I'm very mixed on this. The free-speech-at-all-costs part of me is like, "Hey! Take him off the watch list!" but on the other hand, he wrote a very suspicious sentence in isolation on a crossword puzzle. I can understand his seatmate's concern and I'm reassured that it was taken seriously. Since he's not a published writer and since the line was not surrounded by any other dialogue or scene-setting, he very easily could have been making his explanation up--although really, I'd be more concerned about sanity issues than terrorism because why would a terrorist write "I think this is a bomb" on newspaper? I feel like the authorities were in a bit of a damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't... if the guy ends up not being innocent, they would be crucified for not noting anything. Assuming (as is more likely) that he is innocent, then its a civil liberty violation. IMHO, this is one of the gray areas where civil liberty and security clash. I don't really know enough about the ramifications of being on the Watch list to know whether I think the security benefit is worth the trade-off.
[info]dwagoner wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2004 11:24 am (UTC)
Article no longer available....
I tried to click through the link to the article at the Chronicle and am getting:

"No such article.

We're sorry, but the article you requested is not currently available on HoustonChronicle.com.

If it's an older article that you had bookmarked, you may be able to find it in the archives.

If you got to this page from a current link on our site, then it's an error. In this case, the system has automatically detected and logged the error, but you can submit a Problem Report to report additional information or if you have any questions."

Obviously, they wouldn't pull the story for content......right?

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow