Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Games!

  • Jul. 12th, 2004 at 1:29 AM
side-beard-flip
We had a great weekend of playing with the new games. I seem to be the heavyweight lately, especially with[info]choiceful not around to dominate the Puerto Rico/San Juan[1]. I won Barbu for the 6th time in the last 8 games, I've definitely got the hang of it. But there is more to learn - Andy, Rob and I practiced bid together on a set of 7 hands. While I think Andy misestimated a No Last Two hand (Rob and I didn't like it at all), on several other contracts he seemed to be analyzing them better than I was, so we all have more to learn. I predict duplicate Barbu will help that enormously, but we need 8 players and we only have 5 or 6. I suspect I'm better at playing than at declaring/bidding (ie I think I make losing doubles more often than Andy[2] does). Though we'll learn that from the statistics we keep talking about computing (we save all our scores as spreadsheets, so we have the data ready).

Then Rob & I tied for a win at Ticket To Ride, which was a great game. Just as advertised, it had simple rules and complex gameplay, which is great. The Spiel Des Jahr did not let us down. I did well at picking up the essential principles immediately, I think it helped a little that I've played several other rail games (ie Empire Builder), so am used to thinking about minimal edge sets to span a vertex set...er, I mean, minimal track laying to reach all your destinations :).

Then the bloodthirsty Friedmans and a couple others played Warhammer Quest and I played San Juan with neophytes [info]resipisco, [info]jhogan, and Daniel[3]. [info]jhogan made a good run but I ended up winning.

Then we tried Power Grid, which was a lot more complicated than Ticket To Ride, although not super-complicated on the general scale of games. I seriously mis-analyzed it and made a couple big strategic errors, others seemed to play better, and Daniel eked out [info]jhogan by a small margin. It had a lot of negative feedback which is a little frustrating, it looks to me like a large part of playing well is "gaming" the games negative feedback mechanism by keeping low on the resource it uses to track your progress while developing everything else first. I didn't realize this and was out in front, and when the feedback got stronger in the mid/late game I was screwed. At the end, the game seems to turn into one of these "If I don't block A then he will win, but if I block A then B will win" kind of things where the result depends on who chooses to block who and how well they do it. (Like Illuminati). Which I don't like, its fun to have some interdependency between the players, but I don't like it quite this strong, and it seems to add a lot of randomness to the endgame. I like randomness, but I prefer it to be a constant factor to be dealt with throughout the game. Still, there is plenty to the game, and I'll definitely be playing it again.

Finally, Rob, [info]arcanepackrat and I played Ticket to Ride again. Rob had a lot of low scoring tickets and short segments, and [info]arcanepackrat tried to grab a couple too-long routes and we blocked him, so even though I got blocked once for a 22 point swing I was able to win by a fair bit. Both games I seemed to get tickets that worked fairly well together, though in the first game I made a big mistake keeping a ticket where I didn't get anywhere near either of the two cities.

[1] And to pleasantly distract me? Nah, its pleasant but I don't think I actually get distracted, I'm very singleminded about games.[a]

[2] Yes, Andy is the standard of comparison. If I'm the monster, he's the demi-monster.

[3] I failed at remembering/figuring out his LJ username.

[a] Note to self: having admitted this, must only use "My girlfriend distracted me" as an excuse for losing to people who don't read this journal.
So I won 4 out of 5 - woohoo! I'm very glad that [info]choiceful started game day, I get a lot of enjoyment from playing and from how much fun everyone else has too. I've definitely got the Fun, Friends, Romance, Hobbies parts of my life covered, if only I could do better on Work I'd truly have it all...been thinking about applying at Google lately, we'll see.

Comments

[info]jhogan wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 02:25 am (UTC)
On a tangential topic, do you think that one's Work and Hobbies spheres benefit from being separate? I envision my ideal life as having them merged into one and avoiding all the duplication.
[info]rickthefightguy wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 06:07 am (UTC)
I think having your work and your hobby lives merged makes you a workaholic, no matter how enjoyable your work is. I love my work, and it pays only a little better than a hobby sometimes, but I do have other hobbies as well.
[info]jhogan wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 09:23 am (UTC)
But if you love your work, and are motivated the same as you would be by any other hobbies, doesn't that just make it another hobby? Wouldn't being a workaholic depend on how much time you spend on the work/hobby? (e.g. are you still a 'workaholic' if you only spend 30 hours a week on it?)


[info]rickthefightguy wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 09:31 am (UTC)
Ah, true. I (apparently incorrectly) inferred from your post that the idea of combining work and hobby would be to focus more, rather than less - you said 'avoid duplication', which I took to mean 'spend all your time on one thing' - which would be sort of sad.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 02:37 am (UTC)
Duplicate Barbu?
I've played duplicate bridge, but am having trouble picturing duplicate barbu. How would you keep track of the cards in the domino contract?

Wondering in Austin
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 12:51 pm (UTC)
Re: Duplicate Barbu?
Dominos would be the most difficult. However, its still just a problem of mechanics. People could write down their hands and reconstruct them afterwards.

Another option is people could play cards in front of them and leave the extrema face up. ie if the starting card is tens, and I play the Tc, its face up in front of me. If someone plays the 9c, its face up. Now if someone plays the 8c, the 9c is flipped face down. So the face up cards are the cards you can play on. You'll have to glance around at the cards in front of everyone to see where you can play, which is not as nice as having them in the middle, but it still works.
[info]gustavolacerda wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 03:09 am (UTC)
ah, so the romance part is re-covered?
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 12:52 pm (UTC)
yes!
indeed it is.
[info]ejwu wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 12:28 pm (UTC)
I would totally be up for playing duplicate Barbu, although I think I'd like to try regular first. Let me know.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 12:55 pm (UTC)
excellent!
Yeah, its best to try regular a few times first so you have enough skill to learn from comparing how hands were played. We were thinking about playing tu. or th. evening this week, are you free?
[info]ejwu wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 04:04 pm (UTC)
Re: excellent!
Thursday is the weekly Google Poker Classic, which I could skip. Tuesday night is more or less free, depending on how I feel at that point about my code freeze at Wed. 6AM.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 04:56 pm (UTC)
Re: excellent!
ok, how about you drop me an email (patri at clevername dot net) tu. afternoon and let me know if you are free.
[info]olstad wrote:
Jul. 12th, 2004 05:29 pm (UTC)
Re: excellent!
yeeeeeeeesss... excellent...

while 'demimonster' is flattering, I think I prefer "evil hunchback cronie" demimonster sounds ominously like you kill me in order to get enough experience and/or gold to kill patri.

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow