Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

In defense of alcohol

  • Jul. 1st, 2004 at 8:38 AM
side-beard-flip
A comic from Modern Drunkard Magazine about alcohol, which as we all know from Homer Simpson is "The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems". While alcohol certainly does cause some problems for society, like most subjects of moral outrage it gets over-vilified. And I find it quite believable that the cardiovascular benefits are a net gain. Alcoholism and cirrhosis are rare, while heart disease is very, very common.

Their rant about MADD is a typical story of how organizations grow and ossify, turning into entrenched power structures dedicated to their own interests. Responsibility In DUI Laws and Drinkers Against Mad Mothers are two sites trying to fight the power. For a lighter take, here's a flash game about walking-while-drunk.

One interesting note from the MADD stuff is that from the sound of it, the states are inclined towards much more sensible policies than the feds. Its easy for overzealous libertarians to just view all governments as evil and not differentiate as to degree, but the difference in responsiveness from the state to the federal level is very significant. This is one reason why I'm not sure how much impact the FSP will have - they are trying to fix the part of government that's least broken. I think their success at increasing freedom will be closely tied to how much they can prevent the enforcement of federal policies in NH.

Comments

[info]robbbbbb wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2004 09:02 am (UTC)
"This is one reason why I'm not sure how much impact the FSP will have - they are trying to fix the part of government that's least broken. I think their success at increasing freedom will be closely tied to how much they can prevent the enforcement of federal policies in NH."

Practical politics: If you can take control of the NH political structure, and make it more libertarian, then you get control of the state legislature, which is the least broken part of the government, it's true. (Although that depends on which state you're in. California's legislature has been on a tax-and-spend bender for the last ten years.)

More importantly, you get control of some House seats and two Senate seats. That shifts the balance of power in the Congress and gives libertarians a real voice.

I worry about the practical effects of voting with your feet. The current Congress is gerrymandered all to hell, and that's led to polarization in politics. Moving to a different state and trying to influence that state's politics will exacerbate these effects.

Heavy-duty polarization of the political structure leads to lots of screaming and comparisons to Hitler. This is bad. Healthy discourse is a precondition of a healthy democracy.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jul. 6th, 2004 05:15 pm (UTC)
well
As someone whose opinions are agreed with by more than 5% of the country, its easy for you to worry about polarization. For those of us whose opinions are in a tiny minority, if we don't polarize, we are totally disempowered. Healthy discourse in a democracy has no reason to involve people whose views are a tiny minority, and usually it doesn't.

If we have 4% of the vote, we get 0% of congress. This is much like being gerrymanderred out of existence. One solution would be true nationwide proportional representation. This will never happen, so moving is the only way that we can actually be part of the democracy.

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow