I was surprised to see the recession contract all the way down at 28.7, but then I read the rules and saw that the definition is 2 successive quarters of negative real GDP growth over the 5 quarter window Q4 2007 - Q4 2008. As opposed to basing it on the NBER, which usually uses that definition but has leeway to call a recession under other circumstances.
It does specify the final numbers, rather than advance or preliminary, and I believe they tend to get revised downward (since they are cooked). The advance for Q1 was +0.6%, the preliminary will come on May 29th.
So the basic issue with this contract is: on the one hand, we're pretty obviously getting pulled into a housing / credit crunch driven recession. On the other hand, the GDP numbers are cooked (if nothing else because they are based on inflation numbers which are deeply cooked (deep-fried?)). So is this a buy at 28.7?
The dramatic fall over the past month seems like a rather extreme reaction to just having a Q1 advance number of +0.6%. So I'm inclined to buy.
It does specify the final numbers, rather than advance or preliminary, and I believe they tend to get revised downward (since they are cooked). The advance for Q1 was +0.6%, the preliminary will come on May 29th.
So the basic issue with this contract is: on the one hand, we're pretty obviously getting pulled into a housing / credit crunch driven recession. On the other hand, the GDP numbers are cooked (if nothing else because they are based on inflation numbers which are deeply cooked (deep-fried?)). So is this a buy at 28.7?
The dramatic fall over the past month seems like a rather extreme reaction to just having a Q1 advance number of +0.6%. So I'm inclined to buy.


Comments
Do you know the closing date?
Using this definition, you can calculate the fair price
of US.RECESSION.08 using the prices of the probabilities
of positive GDP growth. I did this a while back and
it's quite close to the price at InTrade. Hence, there
is no arbitrage opportunity.
5 of those 8 combinations just evaporated, so I believe that justifies a large price drop, even if a low Q1 increases the probability of a negative Q2.
MOST numbers are cooked, and a lot of trading based on technical news is following what they want you to think. That would work better if more people believed them - but you don't. Therefore the data loses merit even if it is true.
Google Mish's economic analysis.