The WSJ swallows the National Association of Realtors press release by reporting: Existing-home sales climbed 2.9%, the first increase in seven months, during February as buyers took advantage of sharply falling prices. The median dropped 8.2% to $195,900, but inventories also declined..
The problem is that sales numbers were not seasonally adjusted. January is the low point of the year for home sales, thus it is no surprise that month-on-month prices had been dropping and have now risen again. Year-on-year sales are still way down:

High inventories should result in falling prices and increased sales, which is how the surplus inventory goes away and the market re-establishes an equilibrium after all the bubble-fueled overinvestment in housing. But we are far from being out of the woods yet. (Calculated Risk has more graphs and analysis).
The problem is that sales numbers were not seasonally adjusted. January is the low point of the year for home sales, thus it is no surprise that month-on-month prices had been dropping and have now risen again. Year-on-year sales are still way down:

High inventories should result in falling prices and increased sales, which is how the surplus inventory goes away and the market re-establishes an equilibrium after all the bubble-fueled overinvestment in housing. But we are far from being out of the woods yet. (Calculated Risk has more graphs and analysis).


Comments
"After falling for six straight months, sales of existing homes posted an unexpected increase in February. But the median home price tumbled by the largest amount on record."
... and my first thought was, "Why is there a 'but' there? What should I expect a good to do after prices fall - sell less?"
Right. I think this is what I meant.
but looking at the chart it looks like '08 is narrowing the Y/Y gap. Feburary is not as much lower as January was.
It's very difficult to take single samples and draw such strong conclusions, so while it may look that way, variance suggests that it could in fact swing either way. If you looks at the broader trends, it looks likely that less homes will be sold in 2008 than in 2007.
It's kind of weird to consider "months of supply" of homes for sale. Also, looking at the data, from a pure data analysis perspective, it looks like Mid 2005 would have been a the first red flag for bad things to come. I'd be interested in seeing statistics on this going back over various market fluctuations (like decades of data).
Sales in February 2008 (5.03 million SAAR) were the weakest February since 1998 (4.77 million SAAR).
Except if you look at SAAR/day to correct for the leap day, 2008 was worse than 1998 too!
I am curious what a graph of rolling 28 day blocks would look like, would it smoth out some of the monthly variation or not?
--Beth