Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Resolving disputes the Joel & Marcy way

  • Sep. 7th, 2005 at 1:38 AM
patri-and-smiley
[info]choiceful and I often joke about using LJ polls to resolve disagreements about what other people think, but we usually aren't motivated enough to do it. But we have nothing better to do tonight, so here goes.

The poll is comparing two different unusual proposals that a wife might make to her husband, and vice versa. S thinks the poll will be biased because she already knows I'm going to win. She's stammering something about the compostion of our friend group and how the bias works in my favor, and I'm like, duh, why did you think I wanted to resolve this with a poll? Hello, strategic mind at work! So here goes:

Poll #565825 Acceptability of odd proposals, by gender
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

FOR MEN ONLY: How would you consider a proposal from your spouse that you have a vasectomy after the two of you are done having kids, along with the expectation that you may have some extramarital sex?

View Answers

Sounds reasonable, I'd go for it
53 (67.9%)

I can see the point of view, but no thanks
16 (20.5%)

That's going a little far
3 (3.8%)

The proposal would freak me out
6 (7.7%)

FOR WOMEN ONLY: How would you consider a proposal from your husband that the two of you have an open relationship? Not "do whatever you want", but some accepted extramarital sex and secondary relationships?

View Answers

Sounds reasonable, I'd go for it
17 (34.0%)

I can see the point of view, but no thanks
21 (42.0%)

That's going a little far
3 (6.0%)

The proposal would freak me out
9 (18.0%)

Comments

[info]octal wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 08:56 am (UTC)
I want to get a vasectomy, combined with really paranoid sperm storage in ~5 facilities worldwide, although I have no real desire to have children.

I also want to get LASEK and a couple other things done. (laser hair removal around neckline, maybe ear-tube surgery to improve drainage)

I do not want anyone from the military going near my penis or eyes, though.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 07:46 pm (UTC)
sperm storage in multiple facilities was definitely part of the negotiations! I would need to research how effective such storage is. but that can wait many years...
[info]contrariandoer wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 09:22 am (UTC)
Private question. I plead the 5th.

I heard sex is a lot better for a man when he knows or has seen
his wife/girlfriend have sex with another man.
[info]dizfactor wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 11:59 am (UTC)
Hmm.

Despite having seen various female partners of mine having sex with other men, I have no idea whether or not this is true. It hadn't occurred to me to think about things that way.

Do you think it might be some kind of evolutionary thing?
(no subject) - [info]contrariandoer - Sep. 7th, 2005 06:03 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]grepmaster - Sep. 7th, 2005 07:00 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]contrariandoer - Sep. 8th, 2005 01:01 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]frogpyjamas - Sep. 8th, 2005 12:23 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]gustavolacerda - Sep. 14th, 2005 09:35 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]gustavolacerda - Sep. 14th, 2005 09:36 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]contrariandoer - Sep. 14th, 2005 10:23 am (UTC) Expand
[info]ejwu wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 09:41 am (UTC)
I didn't answer, partly because I don't really like the answer space that much, but mostly because I'm still traumatized by stories of a friend's brother-in-law's vasectomy gone wrong. The terms "fist-sized blood clot", "three months", and "doctors say they can't do anything" were thrown around a great deal last weekend.
[info]rickthefightguy wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 11:43 am (UTC)
I hate condoms. And I hate my sweetie having to take funny drugs that screw with her hormone levels and make her cranky. Vasectomy, on the other hand, was a minor discomfort for a few days. The worst part, really, was the week of no sex while waiting for it to heal.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 07:47 pm (UTC)
I hate those things too. But I love kids.
[info]silentmonster wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 12:23 pm (UTC)
i can see the point of view. but it's something i don't expect _my_ husband to say.
[info]integreillumine wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 12:45 pm (UTC)
If I were younger/less familiar with polypeople, I would hit #4. So is it relly about exposure to something other than the social norm? It then occurred to me that the proposal might still initially freak me out, depending on the orientation/understanding I have of my partner's attitudes towards marraige, but I'm more likely to answer either #2 or #3. (Are #2 or #3 very separate answers in action?) I suppose there's even a small possibility of #1 in that faroff future, but I have yet to acheive that level of evolution/devolution/development. ;)
[info]only_this wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 03:02 pm (UTC)
I struggled a little also; in fact, I checked whether holding the shift button would let me pick two options: 2 & 4. Despite having been exposed to people who favor polyamory, that particular experience actually damaged my feelings toward it as a lifestyle for myself. I get irritated thinking about those conversations even now! However, reading and thinking rationally about how the race just didn't evolve such that most people would naturally desire to mate with the same person, and only that person, for thirty or forty years, forces me to pick answer two: "I can see the point of view, but no thanks."

Personally, though, if a partner suggested a polyamorous relationship now, I'd freak out. In fact, I'd break up with him. Not because I disapprove of others living this way, but because I decided a few years ago that to be happy and to have the best shot at a lasting marriage, I need to be with someone who values not just me, but the idea of marriage/monogamy. Men like this may be few and far between, but they're out there and I'd just as soon be single as settle for something that isn't going to make me happy.
(no subject) - [info]triath - Sep. 8th, 2005 09:15 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]olstad wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 01:17 pm (UTC)
Given that condoms are mildly annoyinng and chemical birth control is really scary, this is plan A for us (well, perhaps without the poly part) starting in several years.
[info]rosefox wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 01:27 pm (UTC)
There's always IUDs. They're a lot better than they used to be; they earned their bad rep back in the day, but no longer deserve it. It's kind of a shame that very few doctors are willing to install them in women who haven't had kids. (I got lucky: I got mine at age 26, with no prior birth experience required.)
(no subject) - [info]starling321 - Sep. 7th, 2005 02:04 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]patrissimo - Sep. 7th, 2005 07:49 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]tinkerbell_mk - Sep. 7th, 2005 07:10 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]rosefox - Sep. 7th, 2005 07:25 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]starling321 - Sep. 7th, 2005 10:49 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]tinkerbell_mk - Sep. 8th, 2005 08:00 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]choiceful - Sep. 7th, 2005 11:19 pm (UTC) Expand
also - [info]dlakelan - Sep. 8th, 2005 02:37 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]olstad - Sep. 8th, 2005 04:56 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]tinkerbell_mk - Sep. 8th, 2005 08:06 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]olstad - Sep. 8th, 2005 06:08 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]rosefox wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 01:31 pm (UTC)
It's tempting to answer "The proposal would freak me out" because if it only occurred to him now to propose it, after years of being poly and both of us having sex and being involved with other people, I'd be rather startled! Also, "Sounds reasonable" really depends on how it's proposed, and the circumstances thereof. But I checked "Sounds reasonable" anyway, because that's the closest to "Am there, doing that" that you offered. *)
[info]dan4th wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 01:36 pm (UTC)
I am completely baffled as to what #1 has to do (if anything) with #2

[info]patrissimo wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 07:50 pm (UTC)
nothing really. Except that they are things that are potentially freaky that we have proposed to each other, and we were curious to see which was generally freakier.
(no subject) - [info]dan4th - Sep. 7th, 2005 08:02 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]sneaux wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 01:41 pm (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at with the "for men" question. Are you trying to measure attitudes about vasectomies, or about extramarital sex. The way the question is phrased, you combine the two, which could lead to response errors. Maybe that was your point.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 07:51 pm (UTC)
You are right, it was poorly phrased. I was trying to measure attitudes about vasectomies, not about extramarital sex. But the context of extramarital sex makes a vasectomy more reasonable, so we wanted to mention it.
(no subject) - [info]dan4th - Sep. 7th, 2005 08:04 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]onesoul wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 02:01 pm (UTC)
I've come to this discussion with little knowledge about the two you of presently. I understand you to be poly by nature and your wife to not be, is that correct? However, she is okay with you two (but mostly you) seeking a secondary partner/relationship correct?

I guess what I'm asking about is what is the set up/structure for your poly relationship?

Being poly myself (although not in the traditional way ((If there is such a thing))) with a poly partner and considering that I study and run Poly groups, I'm curious about how you two are working on things.

Many more questions to follow but that is the big one for now :)
[info]boffo wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 02:57 pm (UTC)
I'm not poly, but I answered yes because I think the vasectomy proposal is reasonable.

If I were in that situation, I'd probably say something along the lines of, "Okay, but I'm not interested in sex with anyone else."
[info]alexx_kay wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 04:18 pm (UTC)
S thinks the poll will be biased because she already knows I'm going to win. She's stammering something about the compostion of our friend group and how the bias works in my favor, and I'm like, duh, why did you think I wanted to resolve this with a poll? Hello, strategic mind at work!

From my quote file:
"Well now, that's *exactly* the whole *POINT* isn't it?!? Every
time we discuss anything *logically* I *lose*. So I ask him how
is *that* fair, Mr. Smartypants? Logic your way out of that one."
-- Nurse Jones
[info]triath wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 04:41 pm (UTC)
I would just like to state for the record that our polls are not to resolve dispute, they're to learn what others think on an interesting topic. And for bragging rights.

Dude, you're asking for two variables at once, so I'm not sure what you can conclude from these results.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 07:52 pm (UTC)
But our dispute was about what other people think on an interesting topic. It's those disputes which we always think of resolving via LJ poll, which is of course the definitive source on popular opinion.
[info]maxemulien wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 05:17 pm (UTC)
I would have answered "yes" to the question "How would you consider a proposal from your spouse that you have a vasectomy after the two of you are done having kids?", so it follows trivially that I would answer #1 to the question, even though I'm not interested in a poly relationship. If the question included an expectation rather than an option of being poly, or specified openness in both directions, I would probably opt out. As it is, I could simply opt out of the poly clause. I would, however, be surprised by the question.

As I see it, my wife is accepting most of the responsibility for birth control during the period in which we're interested in having kids, so it doesn't seem unreasonable to shift that responsibility once we're done.
[info]frogpyjamas wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 05:32 pm (UTC)
I picked "The proposal would freak me out" but mostly because of the phrasing; I think this is something that I would have discussed after a couple months of dating. I guess my idealized mind thinks these are the types of things that should be settled before marriage.
[info]rosefox wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 08:09 pm (UTC)
This is one of the reasons I'm so loudly out about all my outablenesses: I want them aired and understood at the acquaintanceship stage, never mind the friendship or dating stage. Saves a whole lot of trouble that way.
[info]rosefox wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 07:26 pm (UTC)
Also, men have spouses and women have husbands? That seems slightly... gender-un-neutral. *)
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 07:55 pm (UTC)
it was 1:30am...or maybe its b/c male gay marriage is in the news more often than female gay marriage?
(no subject) - [info]rosefox - Sep. 7th, 2005 08:08 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]tinkerbell_mk - Sep. 8th, 2005 03:53 am (UTC) Expand
[info]dan4th wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 08:15 pm (UTC)
Thought way too hard about this...
I didn't like any of the answers (for either gender, really) so I sort of chewed on it all day trying to figure out what I felt about this poll. I put way more energy into this question than it probably deserved.

Anyway, what I came up with is: I think those are both perfectly reasonable suggestions. Both a vasectomy and an open relationship are perfectly reasonable things to decide, as a couple, to get/have/whatever.

But the idea of trading them off -- this isn't "I want the house painted" vs. "I want to go fishing" -- this is your nuts and her heart you're talking about. The idea of bartering them makes me really uneasy. If you wouldn't agree to the snip if she needed you to be monogamous, I wouldn't agree to it -- because you may go through with it, and she may discover she can't. Or any of a hundred other complications.

They're both good ideas of "things this relationship may need" -- but it seems really dangerous to me to trade them off.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 10:43 pm (UTC)
Re: Thought way too hard about this...
I'm not sure where you got the idea that there was a trade going on, as we have no such intent. The question was merely "which proposal is more likely to freak out a partner?"
Re: Thought way too hard about this... - [info]dan4th - Sep. 8th, 2005 01:37 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Thought way too hard about this... - [info]choiceful - Sep. 7th, 2005 11:30 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Thought way too hard about this... - [info]dan4th - Sep. 8th, 2005 01:38 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]tigresa wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 10:35 pm (UTC)
I hope that L will agree to a vasectomy at some point down the line, assuming I can ever get to the point where I'll definitively decide I'm done popping out the biscuits, because it's so much less difficult a surgery than the women's equivalent. However, my cycles are psychotically regular, so it's possible I could continue to follow the fertility awareness route for the rest of my reproductive existence (using condoms an average of three days a month is really pretty painless). This is more for our convenience, though, not taking into account future poly scenarios.

However, I don't really see it as an either/or scenario (if vasectomy, then extramarital sex). It seems to me that if the husband were to desire extramarital sex/relationships, it would be DURING the time when the wife is consumed with birthing/raising small children and her body/emotions are not in line with being sexy for her man. Once the kids (and parents) are older, the husband's sex drive is naturally fading and the wife's is in its apex, which seems conducive to a (hopefully) satisfactory monogamous scenario (or, if anything, the wife wishing to look elsewhere!!).
[info]starling321 wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2005 10:55 pm (UTC)
That is the funny thing Rob and I were discussing today. With 4 kids and being an involved Daddy, which I can only assume that Patri will be, when is he going to have time for extramarital sex?
You can always find time for sex. - [info]loyale - Sep. 8th, 2005 07:50 am (UTC) Expand
[info]maerdi wrote:
Sep. 11th, 2005 01:55 am (UTC)
I originally checked "I can see the point of view, but no thanks" because that's my attitude about the subject in general. But, like others have said above, if my partner dropped that request sometime after we were married, I must honestly admit that I would freak out. I'm sure we would have discussed and come to a conclusion about this long, long ago; combine this with the fact that I'm great at making assumptions (and my assumption here would probably be that he'd found a particular someone else already and cared for this someone enough to risk our marriage / relationship), and the freaking-out potential is high.
[info]charleshaynes wrote:
Sep. 14th, 2005 05:12 pm (UTC)
"proposal from your spouse?"
*I* the one who proposed getting a vasectomy and socking away sperm in case we wanted kids some day. My spouse is the one who said "I can see the point of view but no thanks" in that she didn't trust the reliability of sperm banks and AI.

Six months after our second kid was born I did get a vasectomy.

Why doesn't everyone do this? My sweetie got a tubal as soon as doctors would let her. (Fucking patriarchal medical establishment denied her a tubal because in *their* opinion she shouldn't get one till she was "older." Grr. Could not find one doctor to perform it before she was 21.)

The "extramarital sex" part is similarly moot. Have always had an arragement like that of one kind or another.

I'm sad that these are still considered "unusual proposals."
[info]lynette_warren wrote:
Sep. 14th, 2005 11:48 pm (UTC)
He'd have my permission, but he'd no longer have me.
Colossal among the things that I love about my husband is his superior capacity to reason. He used that ability to conclude that I'm his ultimate mate. There is no reason for him to look beyond me for sexual satisfaction. He'll never find anyone as good as I am.

If my husband proposed extramarital sex, I would know that there was something gone seriously amiss with his wonderful brain. It would be evidence that he was no longer in possession of the fascinating mind that won me in the first place. If he persisted in such a proposal, he'd get my permission to have sex with anyone he cares to. Anyone, but me, that is.
[info]jtk3 wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2005 04:31 pm (UTC)
Can't accept the premise
I have to reject a premise of the men's poll. There's no way I'd be in a marriage where extra-marital sex was an issue. I want the best in life and having sex with someone other than my wife would be a pathetic experience for me.

I take no pleasure whatsoever in observing that the fact you can even contemplate such a thing reveals that you have no real sense of the highest possibilities of love.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2005 07:07 pm (UTC)
Re: Can't accept the premise
I do take pleasure in observing that the fact that you can't even contemplate such a thing reveals that you have no real sense of the highest possibilities of lust :).
Re: Can't accept the premise - (Anonymous) - Sep. 16th, 2005 04:02 pm (UTC) Expand

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow