You are viewing [info]patrissimo's journal

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Get a piece of Patri?

2009, googles, burning man, need-a-shave
[info]dmorr's post that he is being put in the big one, getting to keep half his equity, reminded me that I have been vaguely thinking about selling some of my WSOP 10K equity. It lowers my variance, gives people rooting fun, and gives me being-rooted-for fun, all of which I like. I don't want to sell too much - after all, it's the best tournament EV opportunity of the year. But I was thinking of selling up to 25% at 2:1 (ie $200/1%). Because the variance of large tournaments is monstrous, you should consider this a lottery ticket with (hopefully) an edge. That is, most of the time you will get nothing, occasionally you will get several times your money, and very occasionally you will get a crazy return like 50:1 up to 1000:1.

Alternatively, even better than a sell is a swap with a good player, since that lowers variance without giving up EV. If any of you are going to play and want to swap, e-mail me. Since there are people who read my LJ and are playing in the big one who I believe play better than me, and those who I believe play worse than me, I'm happy to consider non-par swaps.

Comments

( 35 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]herooftheage wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 02:37 am (UTC)
Yes, please. I'd like 1%.
[info]dogofjustice wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 03:20 am (UTC)
I'm interested in 1% as well.

I didn't start playing poker until less than a year ago, so I'm not ready for the WSOP main event yet (still slumming at Party 5/10), but maybe next year.
[info]glenra wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 05:00 am (UTC)
What's your EV?
What do you estimate your EV to be? And how did you calculate it?



Alternatively, even better than a sell is a swap with a good player, since that lowers variance without giving up EV.



Another way to lower variance without giving up EV is to sell shares at par value or above. Then you should be happy to sell, and people might still buy for the same reason they buy lottery tickets. It'd be "gambling" rather than "investing", but a lot of people enjoy doing that.

[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 05:56 am (UTC)
Re: What's your EV?
Ad-hoc-ly is the basic answer :). It is very difficult to know what my EV is. But I believe it to be several times the buy-in, because the WSOP 10K has such long rounds and so many bad players. In a 500 person event, my EV would be much closer to par (or under par, if the event was tough enough). But in a 5000 person event, many of those players are just dead money.

Another way to lower variance without giving up EV is to sell shares at par value or above.

Huh? If I believe myself to be +EV, then if I sold shares at par, I would be giving up EV (a substantial amount, I believe) compared to putting up the money myself. If I could not afford to put up the money myself, then I would not be giving up anything, 'tis true. But since I can afford to, I merely prefer not to, its not worth it.
[info]krizazy wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 06:18 am (UTC)
Re: What's your EV?
I think you're worth about 4-1 if you wanted to make it fair. 2-1 is a steal.

~D
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 08:16 am (UTC)
Re: What's your EV?
yeah, I think its higher than 2:1 too. But its so hard to estimate. And people get leery of paying too much of a premium. Plus I like to have rooting power :).
[info]glenra wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 07:18 am (UTC)
correction
What I meant was: if you're putting in $10k and your expected value is, say, $40k, then if you sell shares at 4:1 you're not giving up any EV at all by selling. So /if/ you had a good way to know what your EV was to any degree of accuracy, you could minimize the hit you were taking by selling closer to that value. And if your proof were sufficiently rigorous to convince investors, they'd still buy at a lower premium. But if it's all adhockery, then you're stuck offering a big premium.

(My own game is blackjack, for which EV calculations tend to be a pretty straightforward affair.)

In any case, I agree that you're probably worth more than 2:1, and I'd love to take 5%. raphael@pobox.com
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 08:06 am (UTC)
Re: correction
Ah, Ok. Got it. Yeah, I agree with that. But the problem is that its very tough to estimate EV in such an unusual tournament. If you play a very large number of tournaments, say online, then you can estimate your EV in those tournaments. But the WSOP 10K is such a different field and structure than other tournaments, you just don't have the data.

I'm pretty confident I'm better than 2:1, but given that this is the only tournament of this size I'm playing this year, I don't like the variance.

Anyway, you've got 5%.
[info]herooftheage wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 04:58 pm (UTC)
Re: correction
But the problem is that its very tough to estimate EV in such an unusual tournament.

Well, you don't have the advantage of comparing enough trials you've made, but you can look at the group of players that are your peers, and then see how they've done in the thing.

Hmm, though it requires a bit more work, you don't have to limit it to your peers. Throw in everyone you think you have good info on, whether they're better or worse than you, and then interpolate. I don't know how much farther that gets you then noticing "there's a lot of dead money here", but it feels like you could do something with it.

Now of course, I'm pleased that you posted at 2-1. You should be able to see if that turns out to be a low number, if it is, someone in the know should buy all that you're willing to sell, and then resell it at a higher price to late-comers.

Heck, I don't know if they're set up for it, but perhaps a contract on Tradesports...

[info]glenra wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2005 08:05 am (UTC)
Re: correction
Anyway, you've got 5%.

Dropped off a check this evening.
[info]terrencechan wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 06:32 am (UTC)
I'll buy or swap up to 5%, at your choice. Note that I'm on an 18-hour flight and this will be my last post for a day. E-mail terrencechan@alumni.sfu.ca or post in my blog and I'll get back to you ASAP if there's any details you want to work out.
[info]jhogan wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 07:40 am (UTC)
I'm in!
[info]corwyn_ap wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 12:09 pm (UTC)

Any chance I can buy a 0.1% share. I am not feeling terribly solvent right now, but would love to participate.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 06:11 pm (UTC)
talk to Carl (see comment below).
[info]rickthefightguy wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 12:56 pm (UTC)
I know that past performance is no guarantee of future performance, but last year you made 1.5 to 1, right?

Incidentally, I root for you just for bragging rights already... "Hey, that's my friend with the purple hair - he got into the money!"
[info]robbbbbb wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 03:37 pm (UTC)
I root for you for the bragging rights, too. "Hey, my buddy with purple hair is a pro. He's also hilariously funny."

If you're selling partial shares, I'd be willing to kick in a $20 or so. I can't afford $200 right now. Sigh.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 06:11 pm (UTC)
talk to Carl (see comment below).
[info]carlcoryell wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 04:45 pm (UTC)
I'm in for a percent
Sounds like fun. I could probably buy more fun for $200, but the EV would be lower.

And Robbbbbbb you can buy 10% of my share if Patri does this and doesn't feel like dealing with tiny shares.

best,

Carl
[info]corwyn_ap wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 10:57 pm (UTC)
Re: I'm in for a percent
Would you be willing to cover my 0.1% as well? With guidlines as specified in Patri's subsequent post.

Thank You Kindly.
[info]hubt wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 05:06 pm (UTC)
Various EV
What do you think the median EV will be at the main event? What about the EV of the top %5?

How do those EVs compare with the o8 event or some of the other games?
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 06:10 pm (UTC)
Re: Various EV
I don't know.
[info]brec wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 05:58 pm (UTC)
Swapping
I think that the world would be such a better place if all tournament swaps contained a proviso that they become null and void should the swappers ever be seated at the same table.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 06:09 pm (UTC)
Re: Swapping
Even if the swaps are small? It seems very hard for a 5% swap to affect one's play.
[info]brec wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 06:47 pm (UTC)
Re: Swapping
Yes, even if. In major tournaments, 5% can be a quite significant amount of money -- possibly into six digits in the present case.

How can a swap be large enough to provide worthwhile variance reduction yet small enough so that it won't -- even at the subconscious margin on close decisions -- affect play? Further, why should your opponents have to worry about your judgment in finding that bright line as well as about whether you've flopped a set?

Since -- especially in large tournaments -- the chance of being at the same table and thus losing the variance reduction (or other preceived benefit) of a swap is small, why not avoid the potential conflict problem and adopt and promote the proviso: no financial interest in the results of an opponent at the same table.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 07:27 pm (UTC)
Re: Swapping
I guess it seems to me very unlikely that a decision would be so close, and so identifiably close. But you have a good point that the chance of being at the same table in this years zoo will be small. So I'm convinced.

Now, how much are we going to swap? :)
[info]brec wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 10:51 pm (UTC)
Re: Swapping
If the chance at being at the same table were large that would be a good reason to avoid the swap altogether.

The tradition of "small" swaps started in another era. We are now -- for a while, at least -- in an era in which multi-million prize pools are common. Let's keep it clean, and let's bend over backwards if necessary to do so.

There is no way to quantify the variables. I just think it's a good idea to start -- this will be like turning around a huge ship -- moving in the direction of avoiding potential conflicts. And the way to start is for individual players to take a stand.

As to how much to swap -- with The Proviso, of course -- see email :)
[info]herooftheage wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 11:53 pm (UTC)
Re: Swapping
I think you are paying too much to protect the field. Imagine that you are on the bubble, but down and nearly out. You come across someone you've swapped with, and he has lots of chips. You are now throwing away something valuable to you that is expensive for him, and the protection the field is getting for this behavior is small compared to what you're losing.

In fact, in this situation, you should probably forfeit instead of playing a single hand in order to keep your 5% in the other guy.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 11:58 pm (UTC)
Re: Swapping
The rule is if you are ever dealt into the same hand, not if you choose to play against each other. So by the time you find out you are at the same table, it is too late to change your strategy.

So I think this is unlikely to have much effect. One thing to remember is that it is pretty much random what table you are assigned to as tables change. So if you are on the bubble, that means there are 50 tables left. Even if your table gets broken (split up and sent to empty seats at other tables), there is only a 1 in 49 chance that you will end up at his table!
[info]herooftheage wrote:
Jun. 9th, 2005 12:12 am (UTC)
Re: Swapping
Hmm, half-assed calculation #1 has me figuring a possible cost of 1,000,000/20/50 is roughly $1,000; but that would require that one person be knocked out, and one be about to go really far. It is true that the situation isn't likely to come up very often - but if it does, you could feel really pissed about it. And the situation can crop up in lots of forms - not making it into the big money, for example. 5% of $3M would be a lot, for example.

Are people allowed to withdraw from these tournaments at any time? If so, you could always leave before being dealt into a hand with someone whose equity you want to keep.
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jun. 9th, 2005 12:20 am (UTC)
Re: Swapping
There is no withdrawing allowed, that's part of the definition of a tournament.

The situation you describe is extremely unlikely. And in order for one person to have an EV of 1M, it has to be very late in the tournament, which means that the short-stack probably has an EV of tens of thousands, making that $1000 consideration quite small. Note that in general, the value of your 5% stake in the big stack and the value of your small stack go up together, because stack size is in general correlated to ante size.
[info]adam__selene wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 07:59 pm (UTC)
Go Patri!
I am in for 1%.
[info]rifhutch wrote:
Jun. 8th, 2005 09:33 pm (UTC)
Sign me up
Sure...I'll take 1%.
[info]adam__selene wrote:
Jun. 13th, 2005 11:43 pm (UTC)
Another P. Friedman from California. Perhaps a distant relative?

Event #9 - WSOP $2,000 No Limit Hold'em
3 Perry Friedman (San Marcos, CA, USA) $196,455
[info]patrissimo wrote:
Jun. 14th, 2005 12:39 am (UTC)
There are 3 of us, unrelated - Perry, Prahlad, and myself.
[info]adam__selene wrote:
Jul. 4th, 2005 06:56 pm (UTC)
Odds on the WSOP
Prahlad Friedman is +10000 (pays $10K on a $100 risk) to make the final 9.

http://www7.pinnaclesports.com/guestcontestLines.asp?redirected=yes&contestType=Poker

Pinnacle has no odds on Patri. I'm filing a complaint ;-)

Patri, make a big splash and rectify that lack of notoriety.
( 35 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

May 2012
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow